Doctoral multiple woodwinds exams

I am starting what hopefully will be my final year in pursuit of a doctoral degree in multiple woodwinds performance (flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, and saxophone). Today I kicked off five days of written comprehensive exams. In addition to a musicology exam and a music theory exam, I have been preparing for woodwind-related test questions such as these:

  • Define and explain the following pedagogical concepts, and thoroughly explain.
  • Give a thorough history of the [instrument] from its earliest days to the present. Include important performers and pedagogues, compositions, mechanical developments, and so forth.
  • List [x] pieces for [instrument] and [piano, orchestra, chamber group, unaccompanied, etc.]. Fully describe each piece, including dates of composition, composer’s biographical details, title of each movement, difficulties of the solo and accompaniment parts, and other relevant details.
  • List [x] pieces for [wind quintet, reed trio, Harmoniemusik, saxophone quartet, etc.] and provide all relevant details.
  • Give biographical data of the following [performers, pedagogues, composers, instrument makers, etc.] and describe their contributions to the instrument, its music, and its performance tradition.
  • List and discuss important orchestral excerpts for [instrument].

One day down, and so far, so good. I think.

RSSSubscribe to all comments on this article

One comment on “Doctoral multiple woodwinds exams”

  • Helen

    5+ Frequent commenter

    August 19, 2008

    Best wishes on your comps Bret!

    Helen

Leave a comment

Comments are welcomed, including opposing viewpoints. Real names are preferred, and real email addresses are required. I do reserve the privilege of deleting or editing any comment for any reason, but if you're polite then we're probably good.

You can use these tags, if you're feeling saucy:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>